On 29/05/2024 15:46, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-05-27 at 20:02 +0300, Dumitru Ceclan via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Dumitru Ceclan <dumitru.ceclan@xxxxxxxxxx>
...
>> static const struct ad7173_device_info ad7173_device_info[] = {
>> + [ID_AD4111] = {
>> + .name = "ad4111",
>> + .id = AD7173_AD4111_AD4112_AD4114_ID,
>> + .num_voltage_inputs_with_divider = 8,
>> + .num_channels = 16,
>> + .num_configs = 8,
>> + .num_voltage_inputs = 8,
>> + .num_gpios = 2,
>> + .higher_gpio_bits = true,
>> + .has_temp = true,
>> + .has_vcom_input = true,
>> + .has_input_buf = true,
>> + .has_current_inputs = true,
>> + .has_int_ref = true,
>> + .clock = 2 * HZ_PER_MHZ,
>> + .sinc5_data_rates = ad7173_sinc5_data_rates,
>> + .num_sinc5_data_rates = ARRAY_SIZE(ad7173_sinc5_data_rates),
>> + },
>
> At some point it would be nice to drop the ad7173_device_info array...
>
What are good alternatives to this?
...
>> + ret = fwnode_property_match_property_string(child,
>> + "adi,channel-type",
>> + ad7173_channel_types,
>> +
>> ARRAY_SIZE(ad7173_channel_types));
>> + chan->differential = (ret < 0 || ret == AD7173_CHAN_DIFFERENTIAL)
>> + ? 1 : 0;
>
> I don't think we should treat 'ret < 0' has a differential channel. Any reason for
> it? For me, it's just an invalid property value given by the user...
>
Yes, as that would be the default value if it's missing or invalid
> - Nuno Sá
>
