On 01/04/2024 22:45, David Lechner wrote: >> unsigned int clock; >> unsigned int id; >> char *name; >> + bool has_current_inputs; > Maybe more future-proof to have num_current_inputs instead of bool? At first I agreed with this, but the way that the current inputs are mapped to reg values does not really offer a way to extend them without changing completely the numbering scheme. If that happens, changing this field will be the least bit to need changing.
