It is always recommended to use generic node names for devicetree nodes. The documentation [1] of the AXI ADC IP core says "The most important part of the core is the Receiver PHY module.", so using phy as the node name seems appropriate. [1]: https://wiki.analog.com/resources/fpga/docs/axi_adc_ip Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,axi-adc.yaml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,axi-adc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,axi-adc.yaml index e1f450b80db2..9cad4c439045 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,axi-adc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,axi-adc.yaml @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ additionalProperties: false examples: - | - axi-adc@44a00000 { + phy@44a00000 { compatible = "adi,axi-adc-10.0.a"; reg = <0x44a00000 0x10000>; dmas = <&rx_dma 0>; --- base-commit: 5e3c5871138da700796587aa5f096d39135f9d36 change-id: 20240510-b4-iio-axi-adc-dt-binding-tweak-054f97a78bff
