> Subject: [PATCH 3/8] iio: adc: fsl-imx25-gcq: use 'time_left' variable with
> wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout()
>
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() causing
> patterns like:
>
> timeout = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(...)
> if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/fsl-imx25-gcq.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/fsl-imx25-gcq.c b/drivers/iio/adc/fsl-imx25-gcq.c
> index 68c813de0605..dabc5303d644 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/fsl-imx25-gcq.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/fsl-imx25-gcq.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int mx25_gcq_get_raw_value(struct device
> *dev,
> struct mx25_gcq_priv *priv,
> int *val)
> {
> - long timeout;
> + long time_left;
> u32 data;
>
> /* Setup the configuration we want to use */ @@ -120,12 +120,12
> @@ static int mx25_gcq_get_raw_value(struct device *dev,
> regmap_update_bits(priv->regs, MX25_ADCQ_CR,
> MX25_ADCQ_CR_FQS,
> MX25_ADCQ_CR_FQS);
>
> - timeout = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
> + time_left = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
> &priv->completed, MX25_GCQ_TIMEOUT);
> - if (timeout < 0) {
> + if (time_left < 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "ADC wait for measurement failed\n");
> - return timeout;
> - } else if (timeout == 0) {
> + return time_left;
> + } else if (time_left == 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "ADC timed out\n");
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
