There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like: timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...) if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT; with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code self explaining. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c index a602429cdde4..40ba6506bfc1 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ int ad_sd_calibrate(struct ad_sigma_delta *sigma_delta, unsigned int mode, unsigned int channel) { int ret; - unsigned long timeout; + unsigned long time_left; ret = ad_sigma_delta_set_channel(sigma_delta, channel); if (ret) @@ -223,8 +223,8 @@ int ad_sd_calibrate(struct ad_sigma_delta *sigma_delta, sigma_delta->irq_dis = false; enable_irq(sigma_delta->spi->irq); - timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sigma_delta->completion, 2 * HZ); - if (timeout == 0) { + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sigma_delta->completion, 2 * HZ); + if (time_left == 0) { sigma_delta->irq_dis = true; disable_irq_nosync(sigma_delta->spi->irq); ret = -EIO; -- 2.43.0