On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 6:06 PM Aren <aren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 05:04:53PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 8:57 PM Aren Moynihan <aren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > > stk3310_set_state(iio_priv(indio_dev), STK3310_STATE_STANDBY); > > > + if (data->vdd_reg) > > > + regulator_disable(data->vdd_reg); > > > > I forgot to check the order of freeing resources, be sure you have no > > devm_*() releases happening before this call. > > If I understand what you're saying, this should be fine. The driver just > uses devm to clean up acquired resources after remove is called. Or am I > missing something and resources could be freed before calling > stk3310_remove? I'm not objecting to that. The point here is that the resources should be freed in the reversed order. devm-allocated resources are deferred to be freed after the explicit driver ->remove() callback. At the end it should not interleave with each other, i.o.w. it should be probe: devm followed by non-devm remove: non-devm only. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
