On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:04:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 08:51:10PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:03:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:40:04PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> > > > Add extra IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE and IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW in order to be
> > > > able to calculate the processed value with standard userspace IIO
> > > > tools. Can be used for triggered buffers as well.
>
> ...
>
> > > > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > > > + switch (chan->type) {
> > > > + case IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE:
> > > > + *val = data->chip_info->read_humid(data);
> > > > + ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + case IIO_PRESSURE:
> > > > + *val = data->chip_info->read_press(data);
> > > > + ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + case IIO_TEMP:
> > > > + *val = data->chip_info->read_temp(data);
> > > > + ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + default:
> > > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > + break;
> > >
> > > Is it mutex that prevents us from returning here?
> > > If so, perhaps switching to use cleanup.h first?
> >
> > I haven't seen cleanup.h used in any file and now that I searched,
> > only 5-6 are including it.
>
> Hmm... Which repository you are checking with?
>
> $ git grep -lw cleanup.h -- drivers/ | wc -l
> 47
>
> (Today's Linux Next)
>
I am checking the drivers/iio of 6.8 (on sunday) and I can only find 7
drivers that use it.
> > I am currently thinking if the mutex
> > that already exists is really needed since most of the drivers
> > don't have it + I feel like this is something that should be done
> > by IIO, thus maybe it's not even needed here.
>
> > > > + }
> > > > + break;
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
