On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 08:08:38PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 05:53:00PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
...
> > > + struct {
> > > + s32 temperature;
> > > + u32 pressure;
> > > + u32 humidity;
> >
> > > + s64 timestamp;
> >
> > Shouldn't this be aligned properly?
>
> I saw that in some drivers it was added and in some it was not. What is the
> difference of aligning just the timestamp of the kernel?
You can count yourself. With provided structure as above there is a high
probability of misaligned timeout field. The latter has to be aligned on
8 bytes.
> > > + } iio_buffer;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
