On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 06:37:53PM +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote: > Now that there are two users for the "frequency" extension, introduce a > new COUNTER_COMP_FREQUENCY() macro. > > Suggested-by: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/counter.h | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/counter.h b/include/linux/counter.h > index 702e9108bbb4..03472d7407de 100644 > --- a/include/linux/counter.h > +++ b/include/linux/counter.h > @@ -602,6 +602,9 @@ struct counter_array { > #define COUNTER_COMP_FLOOR(_read, _write) \ > COUNTER_COMP_COUNT_U64("floor", _read, _write) > > +#define COUNTER_COMP_FREQUENCY(_read, _write) \ > + COUNTER_COMP_SIGNAL_U64("frequency", _read, _write) > + > #define COUNTER_COMP_POLARITY(_read, _write, _available) \ > { \ > .type = COUNTER_COMP_SIGNAL_POLARITY, \ > -- > 2.25.1 Sorry, would you make one minor change? The "frequency" extension is read-only so there is no need for a _write parameter (it'll always be NULL). You don't need to rebase and submit the entire patchset again just yet because I will likely have more comments when I review. Just submit the next version of this particular patch separately and I'll pick it up so we can get it merged into counter-next. Thanks, William Breathitt Gray
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature