On 2/28/24 19:15, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 19:03:12 -0600 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
On 2/28/24 18:57, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:49:25 -0600 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
struct net_device {
struct_group_tagged(net_device_hdr, hdr,
...
u32 priv_size;
);
u8 priv_data[] __counted_by(priv_size) __aligned(NETDEV_ALIGN);
}
No, no, that's not happening.
Thanks, one less flex-struct to change. :)
I like the flex struct.
I don't like struct group around a 360LoC declaration just to avoid
having to fix up a handful of users.
That's what I mean. If we can prevent the flex array ending up in the
middle of a struct by any means, then I wouldn't have to change the
flex struct.
--
Gustavo