On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 03:08:56PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 2/28/24 14:24, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:
...
> > + ret = iio_gts_find_new_gain_by_old_gain_time(&data->gts, gain_old,
> > + intg_old, val2, &gain_new);
>
> You don't use the 'ret' here, so maybe for the clarity, not assign it.
> Or, maybe you wan't to try to squeeze out few cycles for succesful case and
> check the ret for '0' - in which case you should be able to omit the check
> right below as well as the call to iio_find_closest_gain_low(). OTOH, this
> is likely not a "hot path" so I don't care too much about the extra call if
> you think code is clearer this way.
>
> > + if (gain_new < 0) {
> > + dev_err_ratelimited(dev, "Unsupported gain with time\n");
> > + return gain_new;
> > + }
What is the difference between negative response from the function itself and
similar in gain_new?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
