On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:55:55 +0100 Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Getting the part name with 'spi_get_device_id(spi)->name' is not a very > good pattern. Hence, explicitly add the name in the struct chip_info and > use that instead. > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> Good change and it nearly went in clean without the previous so I dealt with the one context issue and applied it. Too many patches floating around at the moment so I'm keen to reduce the number where I can by applying them :)
