On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 15:40 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 01:55:56PM +0100, Nuno Sa wrote: > > Add a property for the VDD power supply regulator. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/adi,ltc2983.yaml | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/adi,ltc2983.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/adi,ltc2983.yaml > > index dbb85135fd66..8aae867a770a 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/adi,ltc2983.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/temperature/adi,ltc2983.yaml > > @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ properties: > > interrupts: > > maxItems: 1 > > > > + vdd-supply: true > > Although technically an ABI break, should we make this supply required? > It is, at the end of the day, required by the hardware for operation. > I thought about it but then realized it could break some existing users which is never a nice thing. I recently (in another series - the IIO backend) went through some trouble to actually not break ABI. Meaning, I had to do some not so neat hacking in the driver because Rob was more comfortable with not breaking ABI in DT. So, I assumed he would not like for me to break it in here. - Nuno Sá >
