Hi Jonathan, On 2/16/24 15:58, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 13:20:09 +0200 Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:The loop based 64bit division may run for a long time when dividend is a lot bigger than the divider. Replace the division loop by the div64_u64() which implementation may be significantly faster. Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx> Fixes: 38416c28e168 ("iio: light: Add gain-time-scale helpers") --- This is a resend. Only change is the base which is now the v6.8-rc4 and not the v6.8-rc1Given I'm not rushing this in, it is going via my togreg tree, so the rebase wasn't really helpful (thankfully didn't stop it applying).
Oh, I didn't think about it. Just thought I'll rebase to the most recent tag. I see the point now that you mentioned it, thanks.
Would have been fine to send a ping response to the first posting of it.
Ok. Some maintainers like Mark prefer getting full resend instead of a ping because they don't keep the old messages/patches around. Reacting to ping would require them to go and fetch the patch from lore - while having full resend allows them to apply patch using their normal work-flow. Or, at least I think this is how Mark told me couple of years ago. I must admit that plenty of water has flown through the Oulu-river since that, so maybe this has changed also for them.
Anyways, good to know your preference, thanks!
I was leaving some time for David or Subhajit to have time to take another look, but guess they are either happy with this or busy.
Ok. This is perfectly fine. I just thought that maybe the patch fell through the cracks and decided to re-send before I forget ... :)
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for all the normal reasons.
Thanks! Yours, -- Matti -- Matti Vaittinen Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors Oulu Finland ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
