On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 18:02 -0600, David Lechner wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 3:07 AM Nuno Sa via B4 Relay > <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Instead of open code DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(), let's use it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > 1) For some reason IIO_G_TO_M_S_2() does do not a closest division. Not > > sure if there's a reason for it or just something that was forgotten. > > Anyways, I left it as it was before. > > > > 2) This conversion could actually be required. In some experiments with > > it (in a series I'm working on), I actually realized with > > IIO_RAD_TO_DEGREE() that we could have a 64bit division in 32bits > > archs. I'm still not treating it as a fix as no one ever complained. > > Jonathan, let me know if you want me to send a follow up email (or v2) > > with a proper tag. > > --- > > include/linux/iio/iio.h | 9 +++++---- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/iio/iio.h b/include/linux/iio/iio.h > > index e370a7bb3300..3ebf9fe97f0e 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/iio/iio.h > > +++ b/include/linux/iio/iio.h > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > > #include <linux/device.h> > > #include <linux/cdev.h> > > #include <linux/cleanup.h> > > +#include <linux/math.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/iio/types.h> > > /* IIO TODO LIST */ > > @@ -799,8 +800,8 @@ int iio_str_to_fixpoint(const char *str, int fract_mult, > > int *integer, > > * > > * Returns the given value converted from degree to rad > > */ > > -#define IIO_DEGREE_TO_RAD(deg) (((deg) * 314159ULL + 9000000ULL) / > > 18000000ULL) > > - > > +#define IIO_DEGREE_TO_RAD(deg) \ > > + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((deg) * 314159ULL, 18000000) > > /** > > * IIO_RAD_TO_DEGREE() - Convert rad to degree > > * @rad: A value in rad > > @@ -808,7 +809,7 @@ int iio_str_to_fixpoint(const char *str, int fract_mult, > > int *integer, > > * Returns the given value converted from rad to degree > > */ > > #define IIO_RAD_TO_DEGREE(rad) \ > > - (((rad) * 18000000ULL + 314159ULL / 2) / 314159ULL) > > + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((rad) * 18000000ULL + 314159) > > Is this supposed to be "," instead of "+"? Definitely! Obviously I did some mistake preparing the final patch and out of confidence didn't even built it... Curious why clangd did not complained. Anyways, thanks! I'll send a v2 - Nuno Sá > >
