From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
The complexity of config guards needed for ACPI_PTR() is not worthwhile
for the small amount of saved data. This example was doing it correctly
but I am proposing dropping this so as to reduce chance of cut and paste
where it is done wrong.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc108s102.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc108s102.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc108s102.c
index c82a161630e1..69fcbbc7e418 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc108s102.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc108s102.c
@@ -293,13 +293,11 @@ static const struct of_device_id adc108s102_of_match[] = {
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adc108s102_of_match);
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
static const struct acpi_device_id adc108s102_acpi_ids[] = {
{ "INT3495", 0 },
{ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc108s102_acpi_ids);
-#endif
static const struct spi_device_id adc108s102_id[] = {
{ "adc108s102", 0 },
@@ -311,7 +309,7 @@ static struct spi_driver adc108s102_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "adc108s102",
.of_match_table = adc108s102_of_match,
- .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc108s102_acpi_ids),
+ .acpi_match_table = adc108s102_acpi_ids,
},
.probe = adc108s102_probe,
.id_table = adc108s102_id,
--
2.43.0
