On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:42:34 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:25:42 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 07:22:20PM +0200, Angel Iglesias wrote:
> > > Improve device detection in certain chip families known to have various
> > > chip ids.
> > > When no known ids match, gives a warning but follows along what device
> > > said on the firmware and tries to configure it.
> >
> > I would rephrase it a bit:
> >
> > "Improve device detection in certain chip families known to have
> > various chip IDs. When no ID matches, give a warning but follow
> > along what device said on the firmware side and try to configure
> > it."
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > + for (i = 0; i < data->chip_info->num_chip_id; i++) {
> > > + if (chip_id == data->chip_info->chip_id[i]) {
> > > + dev_info(dev, "0x%x is a known chip id for %s\n", chip_id, name);
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> >
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "chip id 0x%x does not match known id 0x%x\n",
> > > + chip_id, data->chip_info->chip_id[i]);
> >
> > If the matching ID is not the first one, user will have an unneeded warning here.
>
> Could be a dev_dbg() but I'd just drop it entirely.
>
Given that was all that came up, I've hopefully saved us all time by
dropping the bring and changing the patch description as Andy suggested.
With that done, applied.
Jonathan
>
> >
> > > }
> >
>
