On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:53:59AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Can we use iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() here? I believe that has the right handling
> even though I don't think we've used it to protect iio_push_* before. Normally it's about
> enforcing we stay in the mode if the read out of a channel needs to be handled differently
> in a read_raw() callback.
>
> if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev) < 0) {
> /* Not in buffer mode so fine to drop out - we got -EBUSY*/
> return 0;
> }
> //Otherwise mlock is held - though that's an implementation detail all we care about is we can't exit buffer mode.
> ...
> iio_push_...
> iio_device_release_buffer_mode(indio_dev);
> return 0;
Ack, fix it in v2(https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-iio/patch/20230829030622.1571852-1-tzungbi@xxxxxxxxxx/).
