On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 10:04:18AM +0100, Biju Das wrote:
> Replace device_get_match_data() and id lookup for retrieving match data
> by i2c_get_match_data() by converting enum->pointer for data in the
> match table.
...
> + {.compatible = "ti,dac5571", .data = &dac5571_spec[single_8bit] },
> + {.compatible = "ti,dac6571", .data = &dac5571_spec[single_10bit] },
> + {.compatible = "ti,dac7571", .data = &dac5571_spec[single_12bit] },
> + {.compatible = "ti,dac5574", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_8bit] },
> + {.compatible = "ti,dac6574", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_10bit] },
> + {.compatible = "ti,dac7574", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_12bit] },
> + {.compatible = "ti,dac5573", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_8bit] },
> + {.compatible = "ti,dac6573", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_10bit] },
> + {.compatible = "ti,dac7573", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_12bit] },
> + {.compatible = "ti,dac121c081", .data = &dac5571_spec[single_12bit] },
I would reorder them a bit.
{.compatible = "ti,dac121c081", .data = &dac5571_spec[single_12bit] },
{.compatible = "ti,dac5571", .data = &dac5571_spec[single_8bit] },
{.compatible = "ti,dac6571", .data = &dac5571_spec[single_10bit] },
{.compatible = "ti,dac7571", .data = &dac5571_spec[single_12bit] },
{.compatible = "ti,dac5573", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_8bit] },
{.compatible = "ti,dac6573", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_10bit] },
{.compatible = "ti,dac7573", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_12bit] },
{.compatible = "ti,dac5574", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_8bit] },
{.compatible = "ti,dac6574", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_10bit] },
{.compatible = "ti,dac7574", .data = &dac5571_spec[quad_12bit] },
Same for I2C ID table.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
