Hello Andy,
really sorry, I forgot to do that. I'm still not very familiar with all the details of the process, sorry.
I will send a new v3 with the Reviewed-by tag. Is it OK like this?
Thanks a lot, and sorry again.
JB
From: andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 08:26
To: INV Git Commit <INV.git-commit@xxxxxxx>
Cc: jic23@xxxxxxxxxx <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; lars@xxxxxxxxxx <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <Jean-Baptiste.Maneyrol@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Factorize timestamp module
[CAUTION] This is an EXTERNAL email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
======================================================================
Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:21:43PM +0000, inv.git-commit@xxxxxxx kirjoitti:
> From: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@xxxxxxx>
>
> The purpose if this series is to make timestamping from
> inv_icm42600 driver an independent module and use it for both
> inv_icm42600 and inv_mpu6050 drivers.
>
> Create a new inv_sensors_timestamp common module based on
> inv_icm42600 driver and use it in the 2 drivers.
>
> WARNING: this patch requires following commit in fixes-togreg
> bbaae0c79ebd ("iio: imu: inv_icm42600: fix timestamp reset")
> Changelog
> - v2: do some headers cleanup and add some justifications in
> the patches descriptions.
What I haven't noticed is my tag. It's your responsibility to add given tag and
it's polite to Cc to the reviewers (but this will imply by the tag anyway in
this case).
Any explanation why did you do so?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
