On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 1:15 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 1:59 AM Artur Rojek <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> > + u16 tdat[6];
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + memset(tdat, 0, ARRAY_SIZE(tdat));
>
> Yeah, as LKP tells us this should be sizeof() instead of ARRAY_SIZE().
>
> > + for (i = 0; mask && i < ARRAY_SIZE(tdat); mask >>= 2) {
> > + if (mask & 0x3) {
>
> (for the consistency it has to be GENMASK(), but see below)
>
> First of all, strictly speaking we should use the full mask without
> limiting it to the 0 element in the array (I'm talking about
> active_scan_mask).
>
> That said, we may actually use bit operations here in a better way, i.e.
>
> unsigned long mask = active_scan_mask[0] & (active_scan_mask[0] - 1);
>
> j = 0;
> for_each_set_bit(i, active_scan_mask, ...) {
> val = readl(...);
> /* Two channels per sample. Demux active. */
> tdat[j++] = val >> (16 * (i % 2));
Alternatively
/* Two channels per sample. Demux active. */
if (i % 2)
tdat[j++] = upper_16_bits(val);
else
tdat[j++] = lower_16_bits(val);
which may be better to read.
> }
>
> > + val = readl(adc->base + JZ_ADC_REG_ADTCH);
> > + /* Two channels per sample. Demux active. */
> > + if (mask & BIT(0))
> > + tdat[i++] = val & 0xffff;
> > + if (mask & BIT(1))
> > + tdat[i++] = val >> 16;
> > + }
> > }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
