On Sun, 7 May 2023 13:16:57 +0300 Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 5/6/23 21:07, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, 4 May 2023 07:59:00 +0300 > > Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> When BU27034 restores the default register values when SWRESET is > >> issued. This can cause register cache to be outdated. > >> > >> Rebuild register cache after SWRESET. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Fixes: e52afbd61039 ("iio: light: ROHM BU27034 Ambient Light Sensor") > >> > >> --- > >> I noticed this was missing while writing driver for another light > >> sensor. The change is not tested in hardware as I don't have the BU27034 > >> at my hands right now. Careful review would be highly appreciated. > >> > >> This change is built on top of the > >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZFIw%2FKdApZe1euN8@fedora/ > >> and could probably be squashed with it. Unfortunately I spotted the > >> missing cache re-init only after sending the fix linked above. > >> > > > > I'm not sure I follow what would be happening here or if this makes sense. > > > > Partly the following is based on my mental image of how regmap caching works > > and could be completely wrong :) > > > > I don't think it goes off an reads registers until they are actually accessed > > the first time. > > I think this is not the absolute truth. AFAIR the regmap_init may lead > to regcache_hw_init() - which can read the non volatile registers to the > cache. I can't say if this is the case with current bu27034 > regmap-config without taking a good look at this with some thought :) I think that's only true if you provide various things you haven't in the regmap config. > > Nevertheless, we know that _if_ there is anything in cache when we do > reset, the cache will most likely be invalid as HW will reset the > registers. My thinking was that it is just safest to reinit the cache > when this happens, then we do not need to care if regcache was populated > when this is called. True, but that's rather heavy weight when we know we only touched one register. > > > In this case nothing has been accessed before this point > > other than the SYSTEM_CONTROL register and that happens to the one that > > is set to trigger the reset. > > > > So at worst I think the only cache element that will potentially be wrong > > is the SYSTEM_CONTROL register as the cache will contain the reset bits as set. > > > > That would be a problem if you read it again anywhere in the driver after that > > point, but you don't so not a 'bug' but perhaps prevention of potential future > > bugs as this behaviour is odd. If you were to try setting some other bits > > then you'd probably accidentally reset the device :) > > > > So, what's the ideal solution. You could just bypass the regcache initially > > and turn it on later. > > I think I've never temporarily bypassed the cache when I've used one :) > I need to check how this is done :) > regcache_cache_bypass(map, true / false); > > Thus it would never become wrong due to the reset (as nothing > > would be cached until after that). > > > > Or just leave it as you have it here, but explain why it matters - as prevention > > of potential issues due to wrong value in that single register. > > Hm. I'd not limit the potential problems to single register as probe may > get changed - or error handling could be added and reset performed after > probe. (I was actually thinking of this as the spec states that if VCC > drops the sensor may go to undefined state and won't recover unless VCC > is turned off for > 1mS. Didn't add this for now as it is not at all > obvious the regulator would support detecting under-voltage - or that > the sensor could really turn-off the regulator as it might be also > supplying something else - so I didn't want to implement some overkill > error handling when we might not have hardware which actually benefits > from this). OK. I'm fine with just reinitializing it and paying the penalty of that being overkill given current code. Combine this with the other patch into one clean fix / tidy up though. Jonathan > > Yours, > -- Matti >