On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 09:29:23 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 16/04/2023 01:11, Marius Hoch wrote: > > Same as the lsm9ds0, except that the lsm303d doesn't > > feature a gyroscope. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marius Hoch <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/st,st-sensors.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/st,st-sensors.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/st,st-sensors.yaml > > index c6201976378f..194aca5542c2 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/st,st-sensors.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/st,st-sensors.yaml > > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ properties: > > - description: IMUs > > enum: > > - st,lsm9ds0-imu > > + - st,lsm303d-imu > > The entries are ordered by name. > > With fixed: > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > I tidied up the ordering whilst applying and also swapped the ordering in patch 3 for similar reason. Note that we are very late in this cycle so unless there is an unexpected delay these will sit in the branch I push out as iio.git/testing until after rc1 when I'll rebase it on rc1 and push out as togreg for linux-next to pick up for the 6.5 cycle. Plenty of time for others to comment in the meantime, but I'm guessing we won't get much and this way I can 'probably' forget about handling this series individually. Jonathan > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
