On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 15:51 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 08:26:41AM +0000, Sahin, Okan wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 07 Mar 2023, Okan Sahin wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > For previous patch(v5), There was feedback from Andy. I did not fix
> > them.
>
> Why not? :-)
>
> > 1)
> > > They have same regmap except for ADC part of MAX77541.
> >
> > Extra space in the Subject.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +#include <linux/of_device.h
> >
> > This is my fault, I missed this comment. I will fix in following
> > patch(v7).
> >
> > 2)
> > ...
> >
> > > +static const struct regmap_config max77541_regmap_config = {
> > > + .reg_bits = 8,
> > > + .val_bits = 8,
> >
> > Do you need lock of regmap?
> >
> > > +};
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Since I do not need lock of regmap, I did not change anything in
> > regmap_config (v6). Do I need to answer this question even if I
> > don't need
> > lock of regmap?
>
> IIRC the lock is opt-out. You need to explicitly disable it if not
> needed.
>
IIRC, regmap_read() is not really reentrant and it is used in the IIO
driver on the sysfs interface. So, yeah, I think you need the regmap
lock and better just leave the config as is. Yes, the lock is opt-out
so let's not disable it :)
- Nuno Sá
