On 18/03/2023 16:55, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 11:33:19 +0100 > Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The ST IIS328DQ is an accelerometer sensor, which is compatible with >> the already supported ST H3LIS331DL. So add the new compatible >> with a fallback to the ST sensor binding. >> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/2bac9ecf-9d2e-967e-9020-1c950487d781@xxxxxxxx/ >> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/st,st-sensors.yaml | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/st,st-sensors.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/st,st-sensors.yaml >> index c6201976378f..5eb71b24a7cb 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/st,st-sensors.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/st,st-sensors.yaml >> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ properties: >> - st,lsm330d-accel >> - st,lsm330dl-accel >> - st,lsm330dlc-accel >> + - items: >> + - const: st,iis328dq >> + - const: st,h3lis331dl-accel > > Hmm. So this separates the particular 'oneOf' group from the description > associated with the ST accelerometers. > > DT experts, is there a better way to do this? Ideally we'd also associate > other similar groups going forwards so it might become less and less obvious > how the groupings work. (bit late for the many groups that exist > already in that list above this point). If by "grouping" you mean how the oneOf items are organized with descriptions, I wouldn't put too much attention to it. You can add some '#' comments to separate the groups, but for me this is still readable. Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, Krzysztof
