On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 09:42:22PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > On 3/4/23 20:35, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 12:57:54 +0200 ... > > I've been meaning to finish namespacing the rest of IIO but not > > gotten around to it yet. > > As this is a separate library probably makes sense to have a unique > > namespace for it that the users opt in on. > > Perhaps IIO_GTS makes sense? > > Thanks. I think I'll use that. Although, as all of the symbols are prefixed > with iio_gts - if I really saw a risk of symbol clash it would probably make > more sense to use just about anything else ;) This because if someone else > were prefixing symbols with iio_gts - he would likely be using the exactly > same namespace. There is another aspect, i.e. global namespace pollution. This saves memory if not used. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
