On Mon, 2023-01-30 at 10:01 +0100, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-01-21 at 16:58 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 13:46:45 +0100
> > Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > The interrupt is triggered on the falling edge rather than being
> > > a
> > > level
> > > low interrupt.
> > >
> > > Fixes: da4d3d6bb9f6 ("iio: adc: ad-sigma-delta: Allow custom IRQ
> > > flags")
> > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > What are the symptoms of this? Given the ad_sigma_delta.c irq
> > handler
> > disables the interrupt until after the data read is done (at which
> > point the
> > level is presumably high again), I don't immediately see why the
> > change
> > here has any impact - either we trigger on the fall, or on the fact
> > it
> > has become low..
> >
> >
>
> Honestly I did not checked this in any HW. This was just by
> inspecting
> the datasheet and confirming that the LOW IRQ is not coherent with
> what
> we have in other sigma delta ADCs.
>
> However, after some git blaming, I found this [1] which shows that
> this
> might be an issue...
>
> Hmm, maybe makes sense to add a link to the bellow patch in the
> commit
> description...
>
> [1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20200113102653.20900-3-alexandru.tachici@xxxxxxxxxx
> /
>
> - Nuno Sá
Hi Jonathan,
Anything that I should do in this one? As I did not tested it, it might
not be a real issue but I still think the patch is good even though it
might not deserve a Fixes tag...
- Nuno Sá
