On 13.01.2023 21:47, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 8:41 PM Alexey Khoroshilov > <khoroshilov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 13.01.2023 16:33, Anastasia Belova wrote: > >> It seems it is better to put the whole validation loop under if (rsp) >> check. > > No. The entire patch is redundant. > The code that calls this function is under the control of the same > driver, so we know how to avoid shooting in our foot. I see, there is an assumption that response is NULL iff size is zero. May be it could be documented, because naming of arguments does not make such assumption obvious for fresh readers. -- Thank you, Alexey
