ACPI_PTR() is more harmful than helpful. For example, in this case if CONFIG_ACPI=n, the ID table left unused and code is obfuscated by ifdeffery. Drop anti-pattern of ACPI_PTR() use. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c index 9dfc625100b6..fc09ee6bb174 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ * https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/adc124s021.pdf */ -#include <linux/acpi.h> #include <linux/err.h> #include <linux/spi/spi.h> #include <linux/module.h> @@ -201,19 +200,17 @@ static const struct spi_device_id adc128_id[] = { }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, adc128_id); -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI static const struct acpi_device_id adc128_acpi_match[] = { { "AANT1280", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[2] }, { } }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc128_acpi_match); -#endif static struct spi_driver adc128_driver = { .driver = { .name = "adc128s052", .of_match_table = adc128_of_match, - .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(adc128_acpi_match), + .acpi_match_table = adc128_acpi_match, }, .probe = adc128_probe, .id_table = adc128_id, -- 2.35.1
