On Sun, 4 Dec 2022 15:41:52 +0000 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 19:16:35 +0100 > Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Some inputs need to be wired up to produce proper measurements, > > without this change only near zero values are reported. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sounds like a fix to me. If so, Fixes tag? seems to be there since the beginning, to it would be Fixes: 1696f36482e70 ("iio: twl6030-gpadc: TWL6030, TWL6032 GPADC driver") I think it was just not used with the charger (which is not in mainline yet), so it was probably ignored. > > Anything in here we should be turning off again if the driver is removed > or toggling on suspend? If not, other than the space below this looks fine to me. > I would consider that as configuration, comparing with the nearest relative twl4030, there a similar bit is set in the probe() without disabling it in the remove(). But I think we should set TWL6030_GPADCR in remove() as we do in suspend(), but that is another fix. Regards, Andreas