On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:10:17 +0100 Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On Sonntag, 6. November 2022 13:13:10 CET Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 11:31:36 -0500 > > > > Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 07:24:54PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote: > > > > As in other bindings, let's use specific compatibles together with the > > > > fallback compatible. Adjust the bindings for it. > > > > > > You should state users are already doing this. > > > > I can fix that up whilst applying. However it raises the question: > > Should I treat this as a fix, or a tidy up (that can wait for next merge > > window)? > > > > I'm also fine with this going with the other patch in the series (that lore > > found for me as it didn't go to linux-iio) if that makes more sense. > > > > Sorry for the delay in answering. > The dts patch (2/2) has already been picked up through qcom tree, so I think > you can apply this one to your tree. > It's definitely not urgent, so next merge window would be perfect. Applied > > Regards > Luca > > > If that happens > > > > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: > > > > * New patch > > > > > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-iadc.yaml | 7 +++++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >