On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:01:30 +0100 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 23/11/2022 12:32, Edmund Berenson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 11:42:40AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 22/11/2022 17:14, Edmund Berenson wrote: > >>> - The ad7927 is fully compatible with ad7928 driver, add > >>> documentation for device. > >>> - ad7923 and ad7924 are treated the same in the driver, show > >>> the relationship in the documentation. > >>> > >>> Suggested-by: Lukasz Zemla <Lukasz.Zemla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Signed-off-by: Edmund Berenson <edmund.berenson@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> .../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7923.yaml | 26 ++++++++++++------- > >>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >>> > >> > >> 1. This is a v5, what are the changes? > >> > > The original idea was adding the compatible string into driver itself, > > then it was suggested that I have a fallback compatible to 7928 as the > > hardware versions are treated the same in the driver. After that it was > > suggested to add deprecated flag to standalone compatibility, but doing > > so I didn't want to add compatibility on driver side just to mark it > > deprecated in the documentation, so I dropped driver side changes. > > Finally I had some issues getting the documentation syntax into an > > acceptable form, mainly const vs enum listing of compatibility stings. > > That's a bit too long for a changelog. Keep it short but still > descriptive. Anyway - this must be in the changelog place, so after --- > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > Given it won't get picked up by git anyway and all the info is in this thread (plus we are right at end of the cycle and I want to pick this up). Applied with Krzysztof's tag from v4. Thanks, Jonathan
