Hi,
On 11/18/22 23:36, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> .probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
> that explicitly in the probe function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> index 3ba28c2ff68a..f97fb68e3a71 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> @@ -1545,9 +1545,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id mma8452_dt_ids[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mma8452_dt_ids);
>
> -static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> - const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id = i2c_client_get_device_id(client);
> struct mma8452_data *data;
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> int ret;
> @@ -1846,7 +1846,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver mma8452_driver = {
> .of_match_table = mma8452_dt_ids,
> .pm = &mma8452_pm_ops,
> },
> - .probe = mma8452_probe,
> + .probe_new = mma8452_probe,
> .remove = mma8452_remove,
> .id_table = mma8452_id,
> };
