From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
index e7e1c74a351e..d4604f7ccd1e 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
@@ -348,9 +348,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id vz89x_dt_ids[] = {
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, vz89x_dt_ids);
-static int vz89x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
- const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+static int vz89x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
{
+ const struct i2c_device_id *id = i2c_client_get_device_id(client);
struct device *dev = &client->dev;
struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
struct vz89x_data *data;
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver vz89x_driver = {
.name = "vz89x",
.of_match_table = vz89x_dt_ids,
},
- .probe = vz89x_probe,
+ .probe_new = vz89x_probe,
.id_table = vz89x_id,
};
module_i2c_driver(vz89x_driver);
--
2.38.1
