On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 15:22:57 +0200
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
> can be trivially converted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/mxc4005.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/mxc4005.c b/drivers/iio/accel/mxc4005.c
> index df600d2917c0..b146fc82738f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/mxc4005.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/mxc4005.c
> @@ -385,8 +385,7 @@ static int mxc4005_chip_init(struct mxc4005_data *data)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int mxc4005_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> - const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +static int mxc4005_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct mxc4005_data *data;
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> @@ -489,7 +488,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver mxc4005_driver = {
> .name = MXC4005_DRV_NAME,
> .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(mxc4005_acpi_match),
> },
> - .probe = mxc4005_probe,
> + .probe_new = mxc4005_probe,
> .id_table = mxc4005_id,
> };
>
