On Tue, 2022-10-04 at 17:21 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 4:49 PM Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Now that there are no more users accessing 'mlock' directly, we can > > move > > it to the iio_dev private structure. Hence, it's now explicit that > > new > > driver's should not directly this lock. > > use this > > > I like the end result! > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > > P.S. Shouldn't we annotate the respective APIs with might_sleep() and > Co (if it's not done yet)? > > Hmm, I would say this is the same story as with sparse annotations... I guess, at least, might_sleep() would make sense but I think we should probably do it for the complete IIO subsystem where it makes sense instead of having it in just this new API. - Nuno Sá
