On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 04:49:43PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 18:46:38 +0200 > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Instead of listing directly properties typical for SPI peripherals, > > reference the spi-peripheral-props.yaml schema. This allows using all > > properties typical for SPI-connected devices, even these which device > > bindings author did not tried yet. > > > > Remove the spi-* properties which now come via spi-peripheral-props.yaml > > schema, except for the cases when device schema adds some constraints > > like maximum frequency. > > > > While changing additionalProperties->unevaluatedProperties, put it in > > typical place, just before example DTS. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > I wonder if spi-3wire is device specific (not controller) and should be > > rather explicitly mentioned by device schema. Just like spi-cpol/cpha. > > I think it is, but Mark is expert on this. I would say yes as it's the device with a single data line. > In general I'm waiting on Mark's opinion on the whole idea! The prerequisite changes (except for spi-3-wire) are already queued up by Mark as are changes for other subsystems. Rob
