On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 5:41 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 3:24 PM Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Instead of registering callback to process sensor events right at > > initialization time, wait for the sensor to be register in the iio > > subsystem. > > > > Events can come at probe time (in case the kernel rebooted abruptly > > without switching the sensor off for instance), and be sent to IIO core > > before the sensor is fully registered. > > > > Reported-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes since v1: > > - renamed from "iio: cros: Add cros_ec_sensors_core_register" > > - Call devm_iio_device_register() inside cros_ec_sensors_core_register. > > > > drivers/iio/accel/cros_ec_accel_legacy.c | 4 +- > > .../cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_lid_angle.c | 4 +- > > .../common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors.c | 6 +- > > .../cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c | 58 ++++++++++++++----- > > drivers/iio/light/cros_ec_light_prox.c | 6 +- > > drivers/iio/pressure/cros_ec_baro.c | 6 +- > > .../linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h | 7 ++- > > 7 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/cros_ec_accel_legacy.c b/drivers/iio/accel/cros_ec_accel_legacy.c > > index 1c0171f26e99e..0f403342b1fc0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/cros_ec_accel_legacy.c > > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/cros_ec_accel_legacy.c > > @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int cros_ec_accel_legacy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > ret = cros_ec_sensors_core_init(pdev, indio_dev, true, > > - cros_ec_sensors_capture, NULL); > > + cros_ec_sensors_capture); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > > > @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int cros_ec_accel_legacy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > state->sign[CROS_EC_SENSOR_Z] = -1; > > } > > > > - return devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev); > > + return cros_ec_sensors_core_register(dev, indio_dev, NULL); > > In the case where the last argument is NULL then the new > cros_ec_sensors_core_register() is always equivalent to the old > devm_iio_device_register(), right? ...but I guess it's more idiomatic > to always use the cros_ec version, so I'm OK with this. Yes, it is equivalent. > > > > @@ -372,6 +358,46 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_init(struct platform_device *pdev, > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cros_ec_sensors_core_init); > > > > +/** > > + * cros_ec_sensors_core_register() - Register callback to FIFO and IIO when > > + * sensor is ready. > > + * It must be called at the end of the sensor probe routine. > > + * @dev: device created for the sensor > > + * @indio_dev: iio device structure of the device > > + * @push_data: function to call when cros_ec_sensorhub receives > > + * a sample for that sensor. > > + * > > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure. > > + */ > > +int cros_ec_sensors_core_register(struct device *dev, > > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > > + cros_ec_sensorhub_push_data_cb_t push_data) > > +{ > > + struct cros_ec_sensor_platform *sensor_platform = dev_get_platdata(dev); > > + struct cros_ec_sensorhub *sensor_hub = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent); > > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); > > + struct cros_ec_dev *ec = sensor_hub->ec; > > + int ret = 0; > > nit: don't init "ret" to 0 when you simply assign it right below. Done > > > > + ret = devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + if (cros_ec_check_features(ec, EC_FEATURE_MOTION_SENSE_FIFO) && > > + push_data != NULL) { > > I think the check for push_data should be first so it can short > circuit and avoid the call to cros_ec_check_features(), right? > > In the past I've been yelled at for using "!= NULL" and told that > thing should simply be "&& push_data". I'll leave it up to you about > whether it's something that should be changed here. > > Also: you can reduce indentation of the function and simply if you just do: > > if (!push_data || !cros_ec_check_features(...)) > return 0; Done. > > -Doug