On dom, 2022-07-10 at 21:41 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > It seems you somehow managed to send patches separately from email > perspective. > Make sure you pass parameter --thread to `git format-patch`, so it will create > a proper chain of emails. How should I proceed to fix this issue? Should I wait for more feedback and send a new revision of the patches, now as a proper mail chain? Or should I resend current patchset as a chain? I don't want to spam the mailing list more due to my inexperience contributing. > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 11:17:06AM +0200, Angel Iglesias wrote: > > Simplified common initialization logic of different sensor types > > unifying calibration and initial configuration recovery. > > > > Default config param values of each sensor type are stored inside > > chip_info structure and used to initialize sensor data struct instance. > > > > The auxiliar functions for read each sensor type calibration are converted > > to a callback available on the chip_info struct. > > > Signed-off-by: Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@xxxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Usually this kind of tag goes before your SoB, because it's chronologically > correct. > Ok, makes sense. Thank you for your time and help, Best regards, Angel
