Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年7月6日 週三 晚上8:45寫道： > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 3:08 AM ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年7月6日 週三 凌晨3:09寫道： > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 6:31 PM cy_huang <u0084500@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > > > > > +KernelVersion: 5.15.31 > > > > > > ^^^ Wrong > > > > > I really cannot understand what kernel version I need to specified. > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHp75VeBdgbyDQXEYb9ZZdi3AU=vPw6aKGWbNLnuA_QoN4LE4A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Last time, my understanding is to use the realistic kernel version. > > Then from my development environment, the kernel I used is 5.15.31. > > That's why I changed it from '5.18.2' to '5.15.31'. > > > > Do you mind to tell me what kernel version I need to write for this > > ABI test document? > > I'm almost confused about 'realistic', 'non-stable', nor 'developing'. > > > > If to write '5.19' or the future version '5.20', is it ok? > > It's as simple as "next version that most likely your patch will be > in", in 99.9% cases it's 'current-cycle-version + 1', i.e. 5.20. > It really confuse me for days. Now, it's clear. Thanks. > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko
