On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:33:26 +0100 Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Wolfram is there a standard way to work around missing ACK in cases like > > > this? Would just ignoring the return value be fine or are their i2c masters > > > that will get stuck if they don't get the expected ack? > > Did I get this right: the reset procedures terminates the ACK and STOP? > And the client expects a new START condition for communication? > @Bough Chen, I'm assuming this is still an issue for you? If so can you reply to Wolfram so we can hopefully move this forwards. Found this because it's still listed as needing an action in the IIO patchwork. Thanks, Jonathan
