On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:47:50PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:18 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -650,11 +648,12 @@ static int meson_sar_adc_clk_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > void __iomem *base)
> > {
> > struct meson_sar_adc_priv *priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + struct device *idev = &indio_dev->dev;
> > + struct device *dev = dev->parent;
> It looks like this should read:
> struct device *dev = idev->parent;
Oops, indeed.
> That said, I think this kind of typo is very easy with the current
> naming schema.
> It's been a while since I looked at other drivers but maybe the IIO
> maintainers have some recommendations for us (which would apply to
> multiple IIO drivers, not just meson_saradc).
> For example: I am not sure if iio_{err,warn} functions (which take a
> struct iio_dev pointer) have been proposed/discussed before. I think
> they could be useful for other drivers as well.
Looking deeper into this example, I think the IIO dev usage might be wrong
in the first place, but since there are managed resources attached, I dunno
if it's the way to go. Let's wait for maintainers to chime in.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
