When introducing support for processed channels I needed
to invert the expression:
if (!iio_channel_has_info(schan, IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) ||
!iio_channel_has_info(schan, IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE))
dev_err(dev, "source channel does not support raw/scale\n");
To the inverse, meaning detect when we can usse raw+scale
rather than when we can not. This was the result:
if (iio_channel_has_info(schan, IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) ||
iio_channel_has_info(schan, IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE))
dev_info(dev, "using raw+scale source channel\n");
Ooops. Spot the error. Yep old George Boole came up and bit me.
That should be an &&.
The current code "mostly works" because we have not run into
systems supporting only raw but not scale or only scale but not
raw, and I doubt there are few using the rescaler on anything
such, but let's fix the logic.
Cc: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 53ebee949980 ("iio: afe: iio-rescale: Support processed channels")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
index 7e511293d6d1..dc426e1484f0 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static int rescale_configure_channel(struct device *dev,
chan->ext_info = rescale->ext_info;
chan->type = rescale->cfg->type;
- if (iio_channel_has_info(schan, IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) ||
+ if (iio_channel_has_info(schan, IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) &&
iio_channel_has_info(schan, IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE)) {
dev_info(dev, "using raw+scale source channel\n");
} else if (iio_channel_has_info(schan, IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED)) {
--
2.35.3
