On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 16:53 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2022 08:47:33 -0700 > Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > bitmap_weight_{eq,le} is better than bitmap_weight because it > > may return earlier. > > > > CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> > > CC: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > CC: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx> > > CC: linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > CC: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> > without being cc'd on the cover letter, there is no obvious way for > me to know this is reliant in some series to be found in next. > > Please call out the exact dependency and whilst it's a long list, > it is good to cc all people cc'd on individual patches also > on the cover letter so they have that background information. When doing a treewide change like this, vger would commonly reject the message because of too many recipients. > > Change seems fine, but I've no idea when/if to pick it up because of > that lack of information. You could try using lore with the in-reply-to message header id https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220510154750.212913-6-yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx/ that gives you the entire thread.