Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Document Renesas RZ/G2UL ADC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun,  1 May 2022 12:19:52 +0100
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ADC found on RZ/G2UL SoC is almost identical to RZ/G2L SoC, but RZ/G2UL
> has 2 analog input channels compared to 8 channels on RZ/G2L. Therefore,
> added a new compatible to handle this difference.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v1->v2:
>  * Removed Items and used const for RZ/G2UL compatible
>  * Add allOf:if:then restricting available channels per SoC variant.
> ---
>  .../bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml   | 34 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml
> index d66c24cae1e1..d76c5ba3d625 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/renesas,rzg2l-adc.yaml
> @@ -17,11 +17,13 @@ description: |
>  
>  properties:
>    compatible:
> -    items:
> -      - enum:
> -          - renesas,r9a07g044-adc   # RZ/G2L
> -          - renesas,r9a07g054-adc   # RZ/V2L
> -      - const: renesas,rzg2l-adc
> +    oneOf:
> +      - const: renesas,renesas,r9a07g043-adc  # RZ/G2UL
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - renesas,r9a07g044-adc   # RZ/G2L
> +              - renesas,r9a07g054-adc   # RZ/V2L
> +          - const: renesas,rzg2l-adc
>  
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
> @@ -76,10 +78,24 @@ patternProperties:
>      properties:
>        reg:
>          description: |
> -          The channel number. It can have up to 8 channels numbered from 0 to 7.
> -        items:
> -          - minimum: 0
> -            maximum: 7
> +          The channel number. It can have up to 8 channels numbered from 0 to 7
> +          for RZ/{G2L,V2L} SoCs or 2 channels numbered from 0 to 1 for RZ/G2UL
> +          SoC.
> +      allOf:
> +        if:
           - if:
               properties:
etc

Otherwise I think you can only have one in your allOf: which rather
removes the point of having one.

I was surprised this passed the checks, so added another if to verify my
reasoning...

Jonathan

> +          properties:
> +            compatible:
> +              contains:
> +                enum:
> +                  - renesas,renesas,r9a07g043-adc
> +        then:
> +          items:
> +            - minimum: 0
> +              maximum: 1
> +        else:
> +          items:
> +            - minimum: 0
> +              maximum: 7
>  
>      required:
>        - reg




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux