Re: IIO: Ensuring DMA safe buffers.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jonathan,

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 12:12:41PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> For a long time IIO has been making assumption that ____cacheline_aligned
> was sufficient to ensure buffers were in their own cacheline and hence
> DMA safe.

As you noticed, it's not. __cacheline_aligned is meant to align to
SMP_CACHE_BYTES which is L1_CACHE_BYTES, typically smaller than
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN.

> The above series also highlights that we can do much better anyway on some platforms
> using the new ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN (currently it's only defined for some archs but
> after that patch everyone gets it).  We should be safe to use that everywhere
> we currently force ___cachline_aligned and waste a little less space on padding
> which is always nice ;)

I guess in the meantime you can just use ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, it gives
you the DMA guarantees. Any series decoupling the two will have to
update the use. I prefer to use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN for DMA alignment but
still discussing the best way to address the crypto code changes.

> Given we have no reports of a problem with 128 byte non DMA coherent platforms
> I don't propose to 'fix' this until we can make use of the new define
> in the above patch set.  That is going to make a mess of backporting the
> fix however.  I'm wishing we did what crypto has done and had a subsystem
> specific define for this but such is life. 

Maybe we should add a generic __dma_aligned.

> We will also want to be careful
> that we cover the rather odd sounding case of ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN < 8 given
> there are a few drivers that rely on >= 8 to ensure we can do aligned puts
> of 64 bit timestamps.

I don't think ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN should go below sizeof(long long),
that's what ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN is by default, it would break other
things.

> +CC Catalin for info.  If you can sneak the first patch in your series
> in for next cycle that would be great even if the rest takes a while longer.

I'll try but we have to agree on the crypto change because keeping
CRYPTO_MINALIGN as the smaller ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN risks breaking DMA
into those structures.

-- 
Catalin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux