Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iio: chemical: scd30: Export dev_pm_ops instead of suspend() and resume()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:19:11 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 4:06 PM Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Whilst here move to the new infrastructure using pm_sleep_ptr()
> > and EXPORT_DEV_PM_OPS() so as to let the compiler remove the unused
> > code if CONFIG_SLEEP is not defined.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Tomasz Duszynski <tomasz.duszynski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/scd30.h        | 5 +----
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c   | 8 ++++----
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c    | 2 +-
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_serial.c | 2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30.h b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30.h
> > index f60127bfe0f4..1ac9f3f79271 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30.h
> > @@ -68,10 +68,7 @@ struct scd30_state {
> >         scd30_command_t command;
> >  };
> >
> > -int scd30_suspend(struct device *dev);
> > -int scd30_resume(struct device *dev);
> > -
> > -static __maybe_unused SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(scd30_pm_ops, scd30_suspend, scd30_resume);
> > +extern const struct dev_pm_ops scd30_pm_ops;
> >
> >  int scd30_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, const char *name, void *priv, scd30_command_t command);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c
> > index 9fe6bbe9ee04..6c6c11c2772a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c
> > @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec scd30_channels[] = {
> >         IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(3),
> >  };
> >
> > -int __maybe_unused scd30_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +static int scd30_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >         struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >         struct scd30_state *state  = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > @@ -529,9 +529,8 @@ int __maybe_unused scd30_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >
> >         return regulator_disable(state->vdd);
> >  }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(scd30_suspend);
> >
> > -int __maybe_unused scd30_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +static int scd30_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >         struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >         struct scd30_state *state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > @@ -543,7 +542,8 @@ int __maybe_unused scd30_resume(struct device *dev)
> >
> >         return scd30_command_write(state, CMD_START_MEAS, state->pressure_comp);
> >  }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(scd30_resume);
> > +
> > +EXPORT_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(scd30_pm_ops, scd30_suspend, scd30_resume);
> >
> >  static void scd30_stop_meas(void *data)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c
> > index 875892a070ee..7c332e4e8e46 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c
> > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver scd30_i2c_driver = {
> >         .driver = {
> >                 .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> >                 .of_match_table = scd30_i2c_of_match,
> > -               .pm = &scd30_pm_ops,
> > +               .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&scd30_pm_ops),
> >         },
> >         .probe_new = scd30_i2c_probe,
> >  };
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_serial.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_serial.c
> > index 568b34486c44..8664f3ce6b33 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_serial.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_serial.c
> > @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static struct serdev_device_driver scd30_serdev_driver = {
> >         .driver = {
> >                 .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> >                 .of_match_table = scd30_serdev_of_match,
> > -               .pm = &scd30_pm_ops,
> > +               .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&scd30_pm_ops),
> >         },
> >         .probe = scd30_serdev_probe,
> >  };
> > --  
> 
> Applied as 5.19 material along with the [2-3/3].
> 
> Please let me know if you need a non-mutable branch to pull from in
> order to base other work on these commits.

Yes please.  A non-mutable branch would be great.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux