On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:38:06 +0000
"Tanislav, Cosmin" <Cosmin.Tanislav@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Cosmin Tanislav <cosmin.tanislav@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sorry. I normally try to pick up the earliest fix when I get
multiple fixes for the same thing but I failed to notice
yours before applying the one Dan sent out!
As a result I've already picked that one up
Thanks for the patch though and I'll check more carefully next
time!
Jonathan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:03 AM
> > To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: jic23@xxxxxxxxxx; Tanislav, Cosmin <Cosmin.Tanislav@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH -next] iio:accel:adxl367: fix missing unlock on error in
> > adxl367_buffer_predisable()
> >
> > [External]
> >
> > Add the missing unlock before return from function
> > adxl367_buffer_predisable()
> > in the error handling case.
> >
> > Fixes: cbab791c5e2a ("iio: accel: add ADXL367 driver")
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/accel/adxl367.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367.c
> > index b452d74b1d4d..bdc95409abed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367.c
> > @@ -1359,7 +1359,7 @@ static int adxl367_buffer_predisable(struct iio_dev
> > *indio_dev)
> >
> > ret = adxl367_set_measure_en(st, true);
> > if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > + goto out;
> >
> > ret = adxl367_set_temp_adc_mask_en(st, indio_dev-
> > >active_scan_mask,
> > false);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>
