On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 01:26, Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The formula for the ADC sampling period in ast2400/ast2500 is:
> ADC clock period = PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[31:17] + 1) * (ADC0C[9:0])
> When ADC0C[9:0] is set to 0 the sampling voltage will be lower than
> expected, because the hardware may not have enough time to
> charge/discharge to a stable voltage. This patch use the flag
> CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED which will use the raw value read from the
> register, with the value of zero considered invalid to conform to the
> corrected formula.
(to answer my own question)
..and this is okay on the 2600, because we do not set need_prescaler =
true on that platform.
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fixes: 573803234e72 ("iio: Aspeed ADC")
> Reported-by: Konstantin Klubnichkin <kitsok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> index a957cad1bfab..ffae64f39221 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> @@ -539,7 +539,9 @@ static int aspeed_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> data->clk_scaler = devm_clk_hw_register_divider(
> &pdev->dev, clk_name, clk_parent_name, scaler_flags,
> data->base + ASPEED_REG_CLOCK_CONTROL, 0,
> - data->model_data->scaler_bit_width, 0, &data->clk_lock);
> + data->model_data->scaler_bit_width,
> + data->model_data->need_prescaler ? CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED : 0,
> + &data->clk_lock);
> if (IS_ERR(data->clk_scaler))
> return PTR_ERR(data->clk_scaler);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
