On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 16:57:08 +0800 Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The formula for the ADC sampling period in ast2400/ast2500 is: > ADC clock period = PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[31:17] + 1) * (ADC0C[9:0]) > When ADC0C[9:0] is set to 0 the sampling voltage will be lower than > expected, because the hardware may not have enough time to > charge/discharge to a stable voltage. > > Reported-by: Konstantin Klubnichkin <kitsok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi Billy, Fixes tag? Also, would be good to call out in the patch description that CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED rules at 0 as a valid value and hence avoids the ADC0C[9:0] value of 0 that is causing problems. That may be obvious to people who make frequent use of clk dividers but it's not locally obvious when looking at this patch. Otherwise looks good to me. Thanks, Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c > index a957cad1bfab..ffae64f39221 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c > @@ -539,7 +539,9 @@ static int aspeed_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > data->clk_scaler = devm_clk_hw_register_divider( > &pdev->dev, clk_name, clk_parent_name, scaler_flags, > data->base + ASPEED_REG_CLOCK_CONTROL, 0, > - data->model_data->scaler_bit_width, 0, &data->clk_lock); > + data->model_data->scaler_bit_width, > + data->model_data->need_prescaler ? CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED : 0, > + &data->clk_lock); > if (IS_ERR(data->clk_scaler)) > return PTR_ERR(data->clk_scaler); >
